Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory
2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 1.7 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 | 37.1 | 30.8 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 37.8 | 29.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 | 37,6 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 37,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||