Table of contents:
Pros and cons
- Short braking distance on snow
- -
Show more details ...
Competitors
Sizes
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 is made in 48 sizes, starting from 155/80 R13 up to 235/60 R18.
13"
17"
Similar tires
Comparison: tyres similar to Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Timeline
2022
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was launched and replaced Kumho WinterCraft WP51.
2022
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was tested 2x (Autobild,...)
2023
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was tested 4x (Autobild,...)
Achievements
Best
Dry braking
Adac 2023
Autobild 2022
Best
Aquaplaning - cross
Adac 2023
Best
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Adac 2023
Best
Snow traction
Adac 2023
Best
Wet braking
Adac 2023
Best
Dry handling
Autobild 2022
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was featured:
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/40 R18
good
Ranked #7 of 11
Securing the 7th place among 11 contenders, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 showcased commendable performance in a recent evaluation. It was praised for its excellent winter attributes, assured handling on dry surfaces, and notably short braking distances on both wet and dry roads. The tire also stood out for its affordability, providing good value for money. However, it wasn't without its drawbacks. Critics pointed out the tire's limited resistance to aquaplaning and only moderate lateral grip on wet surfaces, marking areas where improvements could enhance its competence. Despite these criticisms, the tire earned a final rating of 'Good', solidifying its stance as a reliable winter tire choice for consumers seeking a blend of safety, performance, and economic value.
good
Ranked #7 of 11
Securing the 7th place among 11 contenders, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 showcased commendable performance in a recent evaluation. It was praised for its excellent winter attributes, assured handling on dry surfaces, and notably short braking distances on both wet and dry roads. The tire also stood out for its affordability, providing good value for money. However, it wasn't without its drawbacks. Critics pointed out the tire's limited resistance to aquaplaning and only moderate lateral grip on wet surfaces, marking areas where improvements could enhance its competence. Despite these criticisms, the tire earned a final rating of 'Good', solidifying its stance as a reliable winter tire choice for consumers seeking a blend of safety, performance, and economic value.
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17
satisfactory
Ranked #9 of 16
The Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 placed 9th among 16 competitors and was awarded a final rating of 'Satisfactory'. The tyre demonstrated good performance on winter roads, with notably the highest projected mileage in its test group, minimal wear, and low fuel consumption. However, it showed weaknesses in driving comfort and handling at the limit on dry roads, along with slight weaknesses on wet pavements, and was noted for its very high weight. While it offered decent longitudinal aquaplaning resistance and braking distances on wet surfaces, handling in these conditions was only satisfactory. The tyre excelled in winter conditions, particularly in snow and ice braking and handling, showing good controllability and reserves in critical situations. Despite its strengths, the environmental aspect was downgraded due to it not reaching a good rating for efficiency, partly because of its significant weight, which still achieved a satisfactory assessment. The tyre's fuel consumption was on a good level but insufficient to fully compensate for the negative impact of its weight on its overall environmental rating.
satisfactory
Ranked #9 of 16
The Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 placed 9th among 16 competitors and was awarded a final rating of 'Satisfactory'. The tyre demonstrated good performance on winter roads, with notably the highest projected mileage in its test group, minimal wear, and low fuel consumption. However, it showed weaknesses in driving comfort and handling at the limit on dry roads, along with slight weaknesses on wet pavements, and was noted for its very high weight. While it offered decent longitudinal aquaplaning resistance and braking distances on wet surfaces, handling in these conditions was only satisfactory. The tyre excelled in winter conditions, particularly in snow and ice braking and handling, showing good controllability and reserves in critical situations. Despite its strengths, the environmental aspect was downgraded due to it not reaching a good rating for efficiency, partly because of its significant weight, which still achieved a satisfactory assessment. The tyre's fuel consumption was on a good level but insufficient to fully compensate for the negative impact of its weight on its overall environmental rating.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 2,8 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
satisfactory
Ranked #17 of 19
Finishing 17th out of 19 competitors, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 received a final rating of 'Satisfactory'. The tyre stood out for its dynamic dry handling, high mileage, and good economic value. These strengths were complemented by its exceptional performance in disciplines such as dry braking and dry handling, where it demonstrated leading capabilities. Additionally, its balance of performance and cost earned it high marks for price/value. However, its performance was not without drawbacks. It was critiqued for having limited grip levels on wet surfaces, displaying significant understeering characteristics during wet handling, and offering low aquaplaning reserves. Despite these challenges, its positives in dry conditions and overall value proposition held considerable merit.
satisfactory
Ranked #17 of 19
Finishing 17th out of 19 competitors, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 received a final rating of 'Satisfactory'. The tyre stood out for its dynamic dry handling, high mileage, and good economic value. These strengths were complemented by its exceptional performance in disciplines such as dry braking and dry handling, where it demonstrated leading capabilities. Additionally, its balance of performance and cost earned it high marks for price/value. However, its performance was not without drawbacks. It was critiqued for having limited grip levels on wet surfaces, displaying significant understeering characteristics during wet handling, and offering low aquaplaning reserves. Despite these challenges, its positives in dry conditions and overall value proposition held considerable merit.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Ranked #19 of 56
Ranked #19 of 56
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow |
|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 |
Test ratings distribution
| 85% (3x) | |
|---|---|
| Satisfactory | Good |
| 2x | 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R17 | R18 |
|---|---|
| 85% (2x) | 85% (1x) |
Ratings x Width
| 215/xx Rxx | 225/xx Rxx |
|---|---|
| 85% (1x) | 85% (2x) |
FAQ
Where is Kumho WinterCraft WP52 made?
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea.