• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Yokohama (46%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 49% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V906. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the BluEarth winter V906 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.

# Yokohama BluEarth winter V906
/49%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
/55%

Add to comparison

Yokohama
Kumho
DimensionsR15 - R21 R0 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

4

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+12+
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
Rating: Satisfactory
3+3+3+3+
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Rating: Satisfactory
3+32+3
Show test details
ADAC
Name WinterWetDryEnviromental impactNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1.72.12.21.72.71.61.3
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
Rating: Satisfactory
2.92.42.93.13.83.11.7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Rating: Sufficient
2.32.63.62.63.91.81.5
Show test details
AUTOBILD
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34.628.9
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V90637.130.8
Kumho Wintercraft WP5234.6 30.3
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Yokohama BluEarth winter V90637,627
Kumho WinterCraft WP5235,927,3
Show test details