Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Viking WinTech Lowcost3. Avon ZV7 Lowcost4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost5. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost6. General Altimax Winter 3 Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Viking WinTech Lowcost3. Avon ZV7 Lowcost4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost5. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost6. General Altimax Winter 3 Lowcost
2. Avon ZV7 278
3. Avon ZV7 8.
6. Avon ZV7 42.
3. Avon ZV7 18.554. Viking WinTech 20.83
1. Viking WinTech Recommended2. General Altimax Winter 3 Satisfactory3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory5. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
1. General Altimax Winter 3 Satisfactory2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended3. Avon ZV7 Sufficient4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 37,1 | 27,1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| General Altimax Winter 3 | 38,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||