Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Viking (57%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 57% of the Viking WinTech. The first tyre test of Viking WinTech was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the WinTech and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Viking WinTech
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R0 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
2. Viking WinTech 20.83
1. Viking WinTech Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Viking WinTech | 37,1 | 27,1 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
Show test details |