Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle7. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Nokian Powerproof 7.454. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.257. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended5. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended6. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended7. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,8 | 27,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
