• 14 shops, 56 847 products
Conditionally recommended
#36
Summer tires
2026
3.6/5
Price from: £69
12 Tests
Compare

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

The Dynaxer HP4 is a balanced tyre, but some of the tests criticize it's worse mileage and wet performance. For a lower price, it could be a good option.
Jiri Chomat, TheTyreLab.com
Comparison chart Comparison chart Comparison chart Comparison chart Comparison chart Comparison chart
check Kleber Dynaxer HP4 availability
Width
Profile
Rim size
Table of contents:

Strengths

Excellent performance on dry roads, including short braking distances and stable handling.

Good fuel efficiency and positive environmental impact.

High resistance to aquaplaning enhances safety in wet conditions.

Comfortable ride with low rolling noise.

Good overall durability and tread wear.

Weaknesses

Average grip and braking on wet surfaces, with some loss of handling precision.

Slightly increased wear rate compared to top competitors.

Steering response can feel delayed, especially in demanding situations.

Tends to understeer, particularly during dynamic driving on dry roads.

Overall handling is not perfectly balanced.

Customer Popularity

84%

Customer Popularity

Based on 49 reviews

What customers like ...
  • Price 14
  • Quality 10
  • Low noise 7
  • Longevity 4
  • Brand trust 6
What customers dislike ...
  • Made in China/Romania 3
  • High balance weight needed 2
  • Limited mileage to judge 3

Performance Analysis: Kleber Dynaxer HP4

This graph shows how the tyre ranks across different properties compared to other tested tyres. Higher percentile means better performance - 100% means better than every tyre in every test, 0% means worse than every tyre in every test.

50%
Exterior noise
Comfort
Dry braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Dry handling
•••
•••

Loading comparison data...

Timeline

2019

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was launched

2020

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 1x (ACE)

2021

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 3x (Autobild,...)

2022

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 5x (GTÜ,...) and won the GTÜ 195/55 R16 test.

2023

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 1x (ADAC)

2024

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was tested 2x (Autobild,...)

Sizes

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is made in 121 sizes, starting from 155/65 R14 up to 235/55 R17.
14"
155/65 R14
165/60 R14
165/65 R14
165/70 R14
175/65 R14
175/70 R14
185/55 R14
185/60 R14
185/65 R14
185/70 R14
15"
175/65 R15
185/55 R15
185/60 R15
185/65 R15
185/70 R15
195/45 R15
195/50 R15
195/55 R15
195/60 R15
195/65 R15
205/60 R15
205/65 R15
16"
185/55 R16
195/45 R16
195/50 R16
195/55 R16
195/60 R16
205/45 R16
205/50 R16
205/55 R16
205/60 R16
215/45 R16
215/55 R16
215/60 R16
225/50 R16
225/55 R16
17"
205/50 R17
205/55 R17
215/50 R17
215/55 R17
225/50 R17
225/55 R17
235/50 R17
235/55 R17
◀
▶
Filter:
show prices

Similar tires

Kleber Kleber Dynaxer HP4
3.6/5
R14 - R17
Price from:
Bridgestone
Bridgestone Turanza T005

Turanza T005

R14 - R23
4.4/5
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Bridgestone better at:
  • • Interior noise
  • • Wet circle cornering
  • • Wet handling
Bridgestone worse at:
  • • Exterior noise
  • • Comfort
Price from:
Compare
Toyo
Toyo Proxes Comfort

Proxes Comfort

R14 - R20
3.55/5
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Toyo better at:
  • • Wet circle cornering
  • • Dry handling
  • • Wet handling
Toyo worse at:
  • • Wet braking
  • • Comfort
  • • Exterior noise
Price from:
Compare
BFGoodrich
BFGoodrich Advantage

Advantage

R14 - R20
3.35/5
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
BFGoodrich better at:
  • • Interior noise
  • • Dry handling
BFGoodrich worse at:
  • • Aquaplaning - longitudal
  • • Exterior noise
  • • Aquaplaning - cross
Price from:
Compare
Falken
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

R14 - R22
3.35/5
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Falken better at:
  • • Aquaplaning - cross
  • • Dry handling
  • • Wet circle cornering
Falken worse at:
  • • Exterior noise
Price from:
Compare
Firestone
Firestone Roadhawk

Roadhawk

R15 - R21
2.85/5
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Firestone better at:
  • • Dry handling
  • • Interior noise
  • • Wet circle cornering
Firestone worse at:
  • • Exterior noise
  • • Comfort
  • • Wet braking
Price from:
Compare
Barum
Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Bravuris 5 HM

R14 - R21
1.5/5
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Barum better at:
  • • Wet handling
  • • Aquaplaning - cross
  • • Aquaplaning - longitudal
Barum worse at:
  • • Exterior noise
Price from:
Compare
Kleber
Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Dynaxer HP3

R14 - R19
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Kleber better at:
  • • Wet circle cornering
Kleber worse at:
  • • Exterior noise
  • • Dry braking
  • • Wet braking
Price from:
Compare
Uniroyal
Uniroyal RainExpert 3

RainExpert 3

R13 - R16
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Uniroyal better at:
  • • Wet circle cornering
  • • Aquaplaning - longitudal
  • • Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal worse at:
  • • Exterior noise
  • • Wet handling
  • • Dry handling
Price from:
Compare
Matador
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3

MP47 Hectorra 3

R13 - R20
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Matador better at:
  • • Interior noise
  • • Wet handling
  • • Wet braking
Matador worse at:
  • • Dry braking
  • • Wet circle cornering
  • • Aquaplaning - longitudal
Price from:
Compare
Continental
Continental Ecocontact 6

Ecocontact 6

R13 - R23
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Continental better at:
  • • Interior noise
  • • Wet circle cornering
  • • Dry handling
Continental worse at:
  • • Aquaplaning - longitudal
  • • Aquaplaning - cross
  • • Wet braking
Price from:
Compare
Michelin
Michelin Energy Saver+

Energy Saver+

R14 - R16
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Michelin better at:
  • • Aquaplaning - longitudal
  • • Aquaplaning - cross
  • • Wet braking
Michelin worse at:
  • • Wet handling
  • • Exterior noise
Price from:
Compare
Semperit
Semperit Comfort-Life 2

Comfort-Life 2

R13 - R18
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Semperit better at:
  • • Interior noise
  • • Aquaplaning - cross
  • • Aquaplaning - longitudal
Semperit worse at:
  • • Wet braking
  • • Exterior noise
Price from:
Compare
Comparison: tyres similar to Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 in tyre tests

All tyre tests where Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was featured:
All tests
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #13 of 20
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 13th place among 20 competitors in the evaluation, receiving a final rating of 'Good'. This tyre was noted for its excellent aquaplaning safety and short braking distances on dry surfaces, alongside superior rolling comfort. However, it was also criticized for its understeering handling characteristics and only moderate longevity. Highlighting its strengths, the tyre excelled particularly in the areas of comfort and exterior noise, standing out as the best performer in these disciplines. Despite its weaknesses, these qualities make it a considerable option for those prioritizing safety and comfort.
Name
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Ranked #15 of 55
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP437,428,8
Show test details
ADAC
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #12 of 50
Finishing 12th out of 50 competitors, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 tire achieved a rating of "Good" in environmental performance aspects, demonstrating strong results for its lifespan, wear, and efficiency. However, it was noted for not being entirely balanced, with particular weaknesses observed on wet road conditions, which led to a downgrade in its assessment. On dry roads, the tire provided average steering feedback and could benefit from increased stability during dynamic evasive maneuvers. Although its braking distance on dry roads was considered good, it narrowly missed receiving a top rating in this area. The tire performed satisfactorily in aquaplaning tests and braking distance on wet roads but lacked grip and precision for a better evaluation in wet conditions. Despite these shortcomings, the Dynaxer HP4 stood out for its positive environmental impact, attributed to good projected mileage and low levels of wear and fuel consumption, although it marginally missed a higher rating due to its weight.
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP42,12,8
Show test details
Source: www.adac.de
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Ranked #12 of 51
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Kleber Dynaxer HP436,229,9
Show test details
Source: www.autobild.de
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
satisfactory
Ranked #13 of 21
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 12th spot among 21 competitors in a notable performance evaluation. This tire stood out for its excellent aquaplaning characteristics, short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, commendable driving comfort, and its notably quiet rolling noise. However, it did present some challenges, including moderate grip on wet roads, noticeably delayed steering response, and a tendency to understeer on dry roads. In terms of areas where this tire truly excelled, it was unmatched in terms of comfort. Despite these mixed outcomes, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 demonstrated a blend of strengths that could make it a consideration for drivers valuing safety and comfort.
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
Kleber Dynaxer HP42-23+
Show test details
Source: reifenpresse.de
ADAC
ADAC Summer tyre test 2022 215/60 R16
satisfactory
Ranked #10 of 18
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,11,52,41,01,2
Kleber Dynaxer HP42,71,5 2,81,51,9
Show test details
Source: www.adac.de
GTÜ
GTÜ Summer tyre test 2022 195/55 R16
highly recommended
Ranked #1 of 8
Name WetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test6148188
Kleber Dynaxer HP461 48 178
Show test details
Source:
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Ranked #14 of 53
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Kleber Dynaxer HP436,231,6
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16
satisfactory
Ranked #18 of 20
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Kleber Dynaxer HP42-22-
Show test details
Source:
ADAC
ADAC Summer tyre test 2021 225/50 R17
satisfactory
Ranked #11 of 17
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 finished 11th among 17 competitors, achieving a final rating of 'Satisfactory'. Praised for its good performance on dry surfaces and its ability to maintain grip and control even at the limit, braking in dry conditions was identified as one of its strengths. However, it did show a noticeable decline with increasing tire temperature. The tire struggled in wet conditions, failing to impress in any specific area and receiving a lower rating for handling. It was criticized for its weak grip and significant loss of lateral support during acceleration and braking, which led to a downgrade due to its only satisfactory performance in wet conditions. The Dynaxer HP4 was particularly noted for having average rolling noise levels and performed slightly better than average in terms of fuel consumption. It received a decent score for wear, indicating slightly higher than expected wear rates. Among the disciplines evaluated, the tire was unsurpassed in exterior noise, indicating its proficiency in minimizing noise pollution.
Name WetDryNoiseWear
Best values in test2,01,52,61,5
Kleber Dynaxer HP43,12,32,92,5
Show test details
Source: www.adac.de
ACE
ACE Summer tyre test 2020 215/55 R17
conditionally recommended
Ranked #6 of 9
Name WetDryRolling resistanceNoiseRunning costs
Best values in test615620818
Kleber Dynaxer HP44547178 12
Show test details
Source: www.ace.de

Test ratings distribution

100% (1x)95% (1x)85% (5x)70% (1x)
Highly recommendedGoodGoodSatisfactoryConditionally recommended
1x1x1x4x1x

Ratings x Wheel size

R16R17
90% (5x)80% (3x)

Ratings x Width

195/xx Rxx205/xx Rxx215/xx Rxx225/xx Rxx
100% (1x)88.3% (3x)80% (3x)85% (1x)

Other Kleber models

Kleber
Kleber Dynaxer UHP

Dynaxer UHP

R17 - R20
2.15/5
Comparison with Kleber Dynaxer HP4:
Kleber worse at:
  • • Comfort
  • • Aquaplaning - cross
  • • Wet braking
Price from:
Compare

Video