Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.254. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary3. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
