Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

When comparing the Kumho Ecsta PS71 and the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 tyres, there are noticeable differences that can significantly influence your choice. Both tyres are designed for summer driving, but the strengths and weaknesses of each vary.

The Kumho Ecsta PS71 tyre has an overall rating of 72%. No previous models were provided for comparison. Its performance was put to the test by Autobild and ADAC, placing 18th out of 53 and 10th out of 16 tyres respectively. Its notable strength lies in its resistance to Aquaplaning, both cross and longitudal, as determined by ADAC. However, this tyre has no known replacement, making it a standalone model. More details about the tyre and its performance can be found here.

On the other hand, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 tyre significantly outperforms its counterpart, boasting an impressive overall rating of 85%. This tyre is a successful upgrade from the previous Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 model and has since been replaced by the newer Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. Providing superior handling in wet conditions, an excellent price/value ratio, and commendable mileage as noted by Autobild and ADAC, it consistently ranks high in tests. It was recognized as the top performer out of 53 tyres tested by Autobild, and 3rd out of 16 tyres tested by ADAC. Additional information about the tyre and its manufacturer, Goodyear, is readily available for further review.

In summary, based on the test results and overall ratings, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 tyre is a better choice for those prioritising wet handling, mileage, and a strong price/value ratio, with continued improvements seen in its successor. Whereas, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 tyre is a viable option for those considerering Aquaplaning performance crucial, though it lags behind in overall ranking and versatility.