18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Kleber Dynaxer HP4 /72%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%	Kumho Ecsta HS52 /69%	Vredestein ULTRAC /16%	Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun /67%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R13 - R23	R14 - R20	R15 - R21	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (by Kleber) and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (by Hankook) are both summer tyres that can be compared based on their performances in various tyre tests.

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is designed for utmost comfort and minimal exterior noise, achieving a comfortable driving experience. With an overall user-rating of 76%, its best features are comfort and noise reduction. In the Autobild test, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ranked 13 out of 21. The tyre's strengths included good mileage, excellent eco-balance, and excellent wear efficiency. However, its weaknesses were evident in unbalanced performance, especially on wet surfaces.

On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a touring subtype tyre, scored an overall user rating of 81%. This tyre was found to be notably good for dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also impressively ranked second place in the same Autobild test. Its strengths include superior traction on both dry and wet surfaces with some minor weaknesses including mild susceptibility to aquaplaning, along with some environmental and efficiency shortcomings.

Furthermore, in the ADAC test, out of 50 tyres tested, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ranked 12th, whereas the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ranked better at 9th position. Also in the Autobild 2022 test, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 showed commendable aquaplaning characteristics, short dry and wet braking distances, excellent driving comfort, and low rolling noise. However, its grip on wet surfaces was subpar, and it showed delayed steering response with understeering behaviour on dry tracks. Meanwhile, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 exhibited excellent dry and wet handling, short braking distances, good mileage, and a favorable price-to-performance ratio. However, comfort was merely average according to the test results.

To summarize, both the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 are good summer tyre options. Despite their individual strengths and weaknesses, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 seems to perform better overall in the tests. The choice between the two would depend on the driver's preference for either comfort (Kleber Dynaxer HP4) or performance (Hankook Ventus Prime 4).

Segment

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 121

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

Number of tests

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 12x

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

Best position in test

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 18.

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

Average position in tests

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58

Year of the last test

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 2023

Best rating in test

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

3. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended

5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
ULTRAC

89%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

68%

Wet braking

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 89%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 88%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 88%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 86%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 91%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 81%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 72%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 63%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 91%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 68%

Wet handling

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 90%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 82%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 53%

Wet circle cornering

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 86%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

88%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

85%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

82%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

70%

Dry braking

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 91%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 89%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 83%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 80%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 88%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 88%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 84%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 60%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

87%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

70%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

70%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 87%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 74%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 74%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 65%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

82%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

69%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

55%

Mileage

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 68%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 66%

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 35%

Rolling resistance

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 84%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 59%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

5. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good
Vredestein ULTRAC Rating: Conditionally recommended
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,4	25,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP4	37,4	28,8
Hankook Ventus Prime 4	35,9	27,7
Kumho Ecsta HS52	35,4	26,1
Vredestein ULTRAC	36,1	26,6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	36,5	28,0
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good	2,1	2,8
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good	2,7	2,4
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good	2,7	2,3
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good	2,7	2,1
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1+
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	2+
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	3
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good	1-	2+	2-
Show test details

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands