• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Semperit Speed-Life 3

# Kleber Dynaxer HP4
/72%
Firestone Roadhawk
/57%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
/30%
Continental PremiumContact 6
/76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
/88%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
/67%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
/71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
/50%

Add to comparison

Kleber
Firestone
Barum
Continental
Bridgestone
Falken
Toyo
Semperit
DimensionsR14 - R17 R15 - R21 R14 - R21 R15 - R22 R14 - R23 R14 - R22 R14 - R20 R15 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

In this article, we will compare the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Firestone Roadhawk. Both are summer tyres from reputable manufacturers, Kleber and Firestone respectively. Via a thorough analysis of several tests, we will determine their strengths, weaknesses and overall performance.


The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 received an 82% rating from our review team. This tyre was noted for its comfort and low exterior noise in the Autobild test, making it a great option for those who value a peaceful ride. In the ADAC test, it received commendations for good performance on dry road and low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice. However, it was criticised for its slightly increased wear and performance on wet roads. The issues with wet surface grip also came to light in the Autobild 2024 test, offsetting its good environmental and efficiency scores.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk scored slightly lower at 72%. The Autobild test commended the Firestone for its excellent handling on both wet and dry roads, but identified a slight weakness in terms of tyre wear and balance. Similarly, the ADAC test highlighted its low fuel consumption, but criticised the tyre's performance on dry and wet roads and noted its slightly increased wear. In the Autobild 2024 test, despite its efficiency and low wear, the Firestone Roadhawk was again criticised for its handling on wet surfaces and its overall balance.


Overall, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 comes out on top. It outranked the Firestone Roadhawk in the mutual tests - 14th out of 53 in Autobild and 11th out of 17 in ADAC. In the ACE test, it also secured the 6th place out of 9. Its consistently high scores for comfort and low exterior noise make it a reliable choice for most.


However, it's worth noting that the Firestone Roadhawk held its own, particularly in the Autobild test, where it secured 10th position. With its notable attributes being its handling, particularly when dry, and low rolling resistance, this tyre could still be a good choice for some drivers depending on their specific requirements.


Ultimately, both tyres offer their own strengths and weaknesses. It's advised to consider your driving style, typical road conditions and personal preferences when choosing the best tyre for your vehicle.

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

8

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Good
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Rating: Good
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP437,428,8
Firestone Roadhawk36,628,7
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,528,0
Toyo Proxes Comfort36,727,5
Semperit Speed-Life 339,028,8
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Good
2,12,8
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2,72,8
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Rating: Good
2,93,2
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Good
2,61,8
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
2,42,2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
2,72,1
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Rating: Good
2,52,7
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Good
2,62,8
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,11,52,41,01,2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Satisfactory
2,71,5 2,81,51,9
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Satisfactory
2,92,23,02,02,3
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Rating: Satisfactory
3,12,82,82,02,2
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Good
2,1 1,92,62,01,9
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
2,41,82,92,01,6
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Rating: Good
2,42,52,4 2,52,5
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Satisfactory
3,33,42,82,01,8
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22-
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2+2+ 3
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Exemplary
2+22+
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Exemplary
222-
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 2-
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Kleber Dynaxer HP436,231,6
Firestone Roadhawk35,731,6
Barum Bravuris 5 HM39,033,6
Continental PremiumContact 636,529,6
Bridgestone Turanza T00535,431,6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun35,831,4
Toyo Proxes Comfort35,233,2
Semperit Speed-Life 337,730,0
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWear
Best values in test2,01,52,61,5
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Satisfactory
3,12,32,92,5
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Poor
4,92,83,02,5
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Rating: Satisfactory
3,32,52,92,5
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Good
2,12,13,12,0
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
2,52,23,52,5
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Satisfactory
2,0 2,92,91,5
Show test details
ACE
Name WetDryRolling resistanceNoiseRunning costs
Best values in test615620818
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Conditionally recommended
4547178 12
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Conditionally recommended
434420 514
Show test details