12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Kleber Dynaxer HP4 /72%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	Barum Bravuris 5 HM /30%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Bridgestone Turanza T005 /88%	Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun /67%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R15 - R21	R14 - R21	R15 - R22	R14 - R23	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

In this article, we will compare the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Firestone Roadhawk. Both are summer tyres from reputable manufacturers, Kleber and Firestone respectively. Via a thorough analysis of several tests, we will determine their strengths, weaknesses and overall performance.

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 received an 82% rating from our review team. This tyre was noted for its comfort and low exterior noise in the Autobild test, making it a great option for those who value a peaceful ride. In the ADAC test, it received commendations for good performance on dry road and low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice. However, it was criticised for its slightly increased wear and performance on wet roads. The issues with wet surface grip also came to light in the Autobild 2024 test, offsetting its good environmental and efficiency scores.

On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk scored slightly lower at 72%. The Autobild test commended the Firestone for its excellent handling on both wet and dry roads, but identified a slight weakness in terms of tyre wear and balance. Similarly, the ADAC test highlighted its low fuel consumption, but criticised the tyre's performance on dry and wet roads and noted its slightly increased wear. In the Autobild 2024 test, despite its efficiency and low wear, the Firestone Roadhawk was again criticised for its handling on wet surfaces and its overall balance.

Overall, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 comes out on top. It outranked the Firestone Roadhawk in the mutual tests - 14th out of 53 in Autobild and 11th out of 17 in ADAC. In the ACE test, it also secured the 6th place out of 9. Its consistently high scores for comfort and low exterior noise make it a reliable choice for most.

However, it's worth noting that the Firestone Roadhawk held its own, particularly in the Autobild test, where it secured 10th position. With its notable attributes being its handling, particularly when dry, and low rolling resistance, this tyre could still be a good choice for some drivers depending on their specific requirements.

Ultimately, both tyres offer their own strengths and weaknesses. It's advised to consider your driving style, typical road conditions and personal preferences when choosing the best tyre for your vehicle.

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle

4. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

4. Firestone Roadhawk 161

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 161

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 121

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

4. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 12x

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 8x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 1.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 8.

Worst position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 18.

5. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 46.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58

5. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 2023

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 2023

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

3. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Good

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

4. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

78%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

76%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

73%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

68%

Firestone
Roadhawk

67%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

65%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 94%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 79%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 74%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 71%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 65%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 75%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 71%

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 70%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 68%

6. Continental PremiumContact 6 61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 75%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 72%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 69%

6. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 77%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 65%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 53%

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 89%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 82%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 71%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 69%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 67%

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 A

3. Firestone Roadhawk A

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM B

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

83%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

79%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

79%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

72%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

71%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 86%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 82%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 81%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 79%

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 72%

Dry handling

1. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 84%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 84%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 60%

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

78%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

72%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

71%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

64%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 87%

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 74%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 69%

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 65%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM ?

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 ?

5. Firestone Roadhawk ?

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

75%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

75%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

74%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

72%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 84%

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 72%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 70%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 68%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 67%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 96%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 78%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 65%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 55%

6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 B

2. Firestone Roadhawk C

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM C

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,4	25,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP4	37,4	28,8
Firestone Roadhawk	36,6	28,7
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	36,5	28,0
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good	2,1	2,8
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good	2,7	2,8
Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Good	2,9	3,2
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	2,6	1,8
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	2,4	2,2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good	2,7	2,1
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	1,5	2,4	1,0	1,2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	1,5	2,8	1,5	1,9
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	2,2	3,0	2,0	2,3
Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,8	2,8	2,0	2,2
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	2,1	1,9	2,6	2,0	1,9
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	2,4	1,8	2,9	2,0	1,6
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2-
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good	2+	2+	3
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2-
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,1	29,6
Kleber Dynaxer HP4	36,2	31,6
Firestone Roadhawk	35,7	31,6
Barum Bravuris 5 HM	39,0	33,6
Continental PremiumContact 6	36,5	29,6
Bridgestone Turanza T005	35,4	31,6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	35,8	31,4
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,5	2,6	1,5
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,3	2,9	2,5
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Poor	4,9	2,8	3,0	2,5
Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Satisfactory	3,3	2,5	2,9	2,5
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	2,1	2,1	3,1	2,0
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	2,5	2,2	3,5	2,5
Show test details

ACE Summer tyre test 2020 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	61	56	20	8	18
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Conditionally recommended	45	47	17	8	12
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Conditionally recommended	43	44	20	5	14
Show test details

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands