Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost4. General Altimax Winter 3 Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. General Altimax Winter 3 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary3. General Altimax Winter 3 Satisfactory4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory5. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory3. General Altimax Winter 3 Satisfactory4. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
