Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
