Fulda Kristall Montero 3

Strengths

Exceptionally low wear, leading to long tire life.

Low fuel consumption, contributing to cost savings.

Weaknesses

Weak performance on both dry and wet roads, which may affect safety and handling.

Customer Popularity

80%

Customer Popularity

Based on 76 reviews

What customers like ...

Good performance in snow 15
Quiet 12
Good price-quality ratio 18
Durability 9
Safety 7

What customers dislike ...

Noise 5
Softness 2
Inconsistent quality 3
High wear 3
Not for sporty driving 2

Performance Analysis: Fulda Kristall Montero 3

This graph shows how the tyre ranks across different properties compared to other tested tyres. Higher percentile means better performance - 100% means better than every tyre in every test, 0% means worse than every tyre in every test.

50%

Snow traction

Snow handling

Aquaplaning - cross

•••

Loading comparison data...

Timeline

2015

Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was tested 3x (Autobild,...)

2022

Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was tested 1x (ADAC)

Sizes

Fulda Kristall Montero 3 is made in 31 sizes, starting from 155/80 R13 up to 205/55 R16.

13"

14"

15"

16"

◀

▶

Filter:

XL 1

show prices

Similar tires

Kristall Montero 3

0.7/5

R13 - R16

Price from:

SP Winter Response 2

R14 - R16

0.75/5

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Dunlop better at:

• Dry braking
• Wet handling
• Wet braking

Dunlop worse at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling

Price from:

Compare

SNOW

R15 - R18

0.1/5

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Kormoran better at:

• Dry braking
• Wet braking
• Aquaplaning - cross

Price from:

Compare

Master-Grip 2

R13 - R16

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Semperit better at:

• Wet handling
• Wet braking
• Dry braking

Semperit worse at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling

Price from:

Compare

Frigo 2

R13 - R16

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Debica worse at:

• Snow handling
• Snow traction

Price from:

Compare

ESKIMO S3+

R13 - R16

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Sava better at:

• Dry braking
• Aquaplaning - cross
• Wet braking

Sava worse at:

• Snow handling
• Snow traction

Price from:

Compare

MP92 Sibir Snow

R15 - R18

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Matador better at:

• Dry braking
• Wet braking
• Wet handling

Matador worse at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling
• Aquaplaning - cross

Price from:

Compare

WinterContact TS 860

R13 - R17

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Continental better at:

• Wet handling
• Wet braking
• Dry braking

Continental worse at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling

Price from:

Compare

WinterCraft WP51

R13 - R17

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Kumho better at:

• Dry braking
• Aquaplaning - cross
• Wet braking

Kumho worse at:

• Snow handling
• Snow traction

Price from:

Compare

MS Plus 77

R13 - R19

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Uniroyal better at:

• Wet handling
• Wet braking
• Dry braking

Uniroyal worse at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling

Price from:

Compare

Winterhawk 3

R13 - R18

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Firestone better at:

• Dry braking
• Wet braking

Firestone worse at:

• Snow handling
• Snow traction

Price from:

Compare

Winter i*cept RS2 W452

R13 - R17

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Hankook better at:

• Dry braking
• Wet braking
• Wet handling

Hankook worse at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling

Price from:

Compare

BluEarth winter V905

R13 - R23

Comparison with Fulda Kristall Montero 3:

Yokohama better at:

• Dry braking
• Wet handling
• Wet braking

Yokohama worse at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling

Price from:

Compare

Comparison: tyres similar to Fulda Kristall Montero 3

Fulda Kristall Montero 3 in tyre tests

All tyre tests where Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was featured:

All tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15
sufficient
Ranked #13 of 16

Finishing 13th out of 16 competitors, the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 garnered a final rating of 'Sufficient'. This tire exhibited markedly low wear, earning the highest marks in this aspect, alongside its low fuel consumption, distinguishing itself positively from its competitors. However, it displayed weaknesses on both dry and wet roads, leading to its downgraded assessment. Despite its commendable performance in snow braking and snow traction, where it excelled as the absolute best, its performance issues on dry and wet surfaces could not be overlooked. Consequently, though it showcased good properties on snow and ice, overall recommendations for the Kristall Montero 3 were tempered, classifying it as only conditionally recommendable.