• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Continental EcoContact 6

Looking for a comparison of Continental EcoContact 6 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Continental EcoContact 6
/48%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/66%
Michelin Primacy 4
/82%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
/29%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
/91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
/81%
Vredestein ULTRAC
/21%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
/56%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
/72%

Add to comparison

Continental
BFGoodrich
Michelin
Barum
Bridgestone
Goodyear
Vredestein
Maxxis
Falken
DimensionsR13 - R22 R14 - R20 R15 - R20 R14 - R21 R14 - R22 R15 - R20 R15 - R21 R15 - R18 R14 - R22
Price
Remove

Today we're exploring and examining two tyres from reputable manufacturers: Continental EcoContact 6 and BFGoodrich Advantage. Taking a close look at these tyres from a variety of tests, we've gathered the data to help us reach a conclusion about which tyre might provide the better experience for you.


Let's start with the Continental EcoContact 6, a summer tyre made in Germany that receives our rating of 63%. This tyre replaced the previous model, Continental ContiEcoContact 5, and has since been replaced by the newer model Continental EcoContact 7. Reviews from AutoBild, confirm its best features include reduced exterior noise, enhanced comfort, and an optimal rolling resistance. Despite these positives, the tyre has certain limitations including a reduced capacity for aquaplaning and increased wet braking distances.


Moving on to the BFGoodrich Advantage, this summer tyre secures a stronger position in our rating, boasting a 76% score. The tyre has showcased top qualities including high-quality comfort and on-road stability even during the driest conditions. Despite these strengths, the BFGoodrich Advantage has been criticized for under-performing handling behavior and extended braking distances in wet conditions.


Looking at their performance in mutual tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage takes the lead in the AutoBild test by placing 20th amongst 51 tyres, while the Continental EcoContact 6 lands 23rd place. This trend is visible in the ADAC test too, where BFGoodrich Advantage secures the 10th spot and Continental EcoContact 6 takes the 8th position among 16 tested tyres. In an Autozeitung test, Continental EcoContact 6 holds the 7th spot while BFGoodrich Advantage is situated at the 9th place.


As summarised, both tyres possess unique strengths and weaknesses. While the Continental EcoContact 6 excels with its noise reduction and comfort, it struggles with aquaplaning reserves and lengthy wet braking distances. Meanwhile, the BFGoodrich Advantage portrays high stability and impressive dry braking, but it is censured for its suboptimal performance in moist conditions.


If you lean towards quiet and comfortable rides and can tackle wet conditions, consider Continental EcoContact 6. If dry comfort and stable driving conditions are more critical, BFGoodrich Advantage is the choice for you.


To make the most informed decision, consider both your driving behaviour and regional climate. Ultimately, a choice between the two highly depends on individual driving patterns.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Satisfactory
2-23+
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2-2+ 2-
Michelin Primacy 4
Rating: Exemplary
21-1-
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
1 2+ 2-
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Exemplary
2+2+ 1+
Vredestein Ultrac
Rating: Satisfactory
1-23
Maxxis Premitra HP5
Rating: Satisfactory
2+2-3
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
1-2+ 2-
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name WetDry
Best values in test146134
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Good
101134
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Sufficient
108108
Michelin Primacy 4
Rating: Highly recommended
125133
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Highly recommended
137127
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Highly recommended
128130
Vredestein Ultrac
Rating: Highly recommended
135126
Maxxis Premitra HP5
Rating: Highly recommended
146 106
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
120104
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,71,62,711,7
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Satisfactory
2,62,43,02,51,8
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
3,02,93,22,52,1
Michelin Primacy 4
Rating: Good
2,01,82,92,02,1
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
1,7 1,83,32,51,9
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Good
2,02,33,21 2,2
Vredestein Ultrac
Rating: Satisfactory
2,11,83,03,02,5
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Continental EcoContact 636,432,7
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Michelin Primacy 436,229,3
Barum Bravuris 5 HM4033,3
Bridgestone Turanza T00535,827,5
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 236,829,7
Vredestein Ultrac36,128,2
Maxxis Premitra HP537,328,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,128,2
Show test details