18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP - 1
Comparison chart

Imperial SnowDragon UHP

Winter
Lowcost
1.7 /10 Not recommended

What we know so far

Imperial SnowDragon UHP is a new tyre. Type: Winter; segment: budget. Because there are not enough full comparative results yet, the page avoids a scored verdict and focuses on facts already present in the database: 64 available sizes from R16 to R21.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Compare all →

See how this tyre stacks up against its closest rivals across all tested properties

ImperialThis tyre
SnowDragon UHP
1.7
MaxxisBudget
Premitra Snow WP6
3.6
Better at: Aquaplaning - longitudal, Wet handling, Aquaplaning - cross
Worse at: Dry braking, Dry handling
BridgestonePremium
Blizzak LM-005
8.7
Better at: Wet handling, Wet braking, Wet circle cornering
DunlopPremium
Winter Sport 5
8.6
Better at: Snow handling, Wet handling, Snow traction
Worse at: Exterior noise, Dry braking, Dry handling
SemperitBudget
Speed-Grip 5
8.0
Better at: Aquaplaning - longitudal, Aquaplaning - cross, Snow handling
GoodYearPremium
UltraGrip 9+
Better at: Wet handling, Wet circle cornering, Snow traction
Worse at: Dry braking, Dry handling
MichelinPremium
Alpin 6
6.9
Better at: Wet handling, Snow traction, Wet braking
ContinentalPremium
WinterContact TS 870
9.9
Better at: Wet handling, Wet circle cornering, Snow handling
BFGoodrichUpper-middle
G-FORCE WINTER 2
8.2
Better at: Snow handling, Snow traction, Aquaplaning - longitudal
Worse at: Dry handling
BarumBudget
Polaris 5
7.2
Better at: Snow handling, Snow traction, Wet circle cornering
Worse at: Comfort, Dry braking
VredesteinPremium
Wintrac
6.7
Better at: Wet handling, Wet braking, Wet circle cornering
Worse at: Comfort
FirestoneUpper-middle
Winterhawk 4
6.3
Better at: Snow handling, Snow traction, Wet handling
Worse at: Dry braking, Dry handling, Comfort
NexenBudget
Winguard Snow G3 WH21
4.9
Better at: Wet braking, Exterior noise, Wet handling
Worse at: Dry handling, Aquaplaning - cross, Aquaplaning - longitudal
AvonBudget
WT7
Better at: Wet handling, Dry braking, Wet braking
DunlopPremium
SP Winter Response 2
Better at: Wet handling, Wet circle cornering, Snow handling
FuldaBudget
Kristall Montero 3
Better at: Snow handling, Snow traction, Wet handling
Worse at: Dry braking

Pros & Cons

Strengths

Long predicted lifespan with low wear, ensuring durability over time.

Lightweight construction contributes to improved fuel efficiency.

Low rolling resistance helps reduce fuel consumption.

Weaknesses

Weak handling and performance on wet roads, posing safety concerns in rainy conditions.

Below-average driving characteristics on dry roads, affecting overall handling.

Poor grip and control on winter roads, making it less suitable for snowy or icy conditions.

History

2020
1× Tested
Autoklub ČR205/55 R16#15
2022
2× Tested
ADAC185/65 R15#15Poor
Autobild215/55 R17#42
2025
2× Tested
ADAC225/40 R18#25Poor
Autobild225/40 R18#42
Price vs Quality
Size:

Tests (6)

All test results →
6 Tests
ADAC Winter
225/40 R18
#25 Of 31 Tyres
Autobild Winter
225/40 R18
#42 Of 51 Tyres
ADAC Winter
185/65 R15
#15 Of 16 Tyres
Autobild Winter
215/55 R17
#42 Of 56 Tyres

Sizes (64)

1 Variants

86H

2 Variants

9194H

1 Variants

90V

1 Variants

97H

Ratings

Tested By professional organizations

Poor2× (100%)

Performance by size

xxx/xx R15 0.0xxx/xx R18 0.0185/xx Rxx 0.0225/xx Rxx 0.0

Other Imperial models

View all →

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.