Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle5. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost6. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.074. Barum Polaris 5 15.156. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory6. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 3+ | 3 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 1.7 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 | 37.1 | 30.8 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 37.8 | 29.3 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 | 37,6 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 37,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
