• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Yokohama (59%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 60% of the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the BluEarth-Winter V906 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.

# Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
/60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
/61%

Add to comparison

Yokohama
Kumho
DimensionsR15 - R20 R0 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,82,0
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
Rating: Satisfactory
2,93,0
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Rating: Satisfactory
2,82,7
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test31,429,2
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V90636,731,8
Kumho WinterCraft WP5236,931,4
Show test details