Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Yokohama (59%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 60% of the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the BluEarth-Winter V906 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.
# | Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R0 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,0 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 | 36,7 | 31,8 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
Show test details |