• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (7)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
ACE ACE
Summer
2024 225/45 R17 View
Automotorsport Automotorsport
Summer
2024 235/55 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 225/55 R17 View
Autozeitung Autozeitung
Summer
2024 225/45 R17 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2024 215/55 R17 View
Autoklub ČR Autoklub ČR
Summer
2023 205/55 R16 View

When comparing the Vredestein ULTRAC and the Michelin Primacy 4+, we can see some noticeable differences, particularly in performance, strengths, and weaknesses, offered by these two summer tyres manufactured by Vredestein and Michelin respectively.


With a rating of 21%, the Vredestein ULTRAC stands out for its features such as Aquaplaning - longitudinal, Aquaplaning - cross, and Dry handling, earning it the 2nd position in the ACE test out of 10 tyres. It also received commendable feedback in the Autobild and Automotorsport tests, earning 3rd position in both. However, it has been marked down for its high rolling resistance, high external noise, increased understeer on wet and dry tracks, and slightly prolonged braking distances.


Made in Spain, the Michelin Primacy 4+, with a rating of 76%, surpasses its competitor from Vredestein in many aspects. It has been replaced by a newer model, the Michelin Primacy 5. Notably, it showcased its strength in Dry handling in the ACE test, even if it only reached the 3rd place. In the automotorsport test, it got the 8th position but did surprisingly better in the ADAC and Autoklub ČR tests where it secured the 2nd spot. It struggled with long braking distances, weak cornering grip and poor traction on wet road conditions, and an increased risk of oversteering during quick lane changes and in load-altering situations.


In conclusion, the Michelin Primacy 4+ appears to have a better overall performance, primarily due to balanced capabilities, secure properties on both dry and wet tracks, and an impressively high projected mileage coupled with low weight and fuel consumption. On the other hand, the Vredestein ULTRAC seems to falter on a couple of points, such as increased rolling resistance and exterior noise, and it shows lower mileage projection and high wear and tear, which might be relevant if you are considering the value for money. However, it holds up with its secure handling properties and universally good aquaplaning characteristics.


It's important to consider your driving preferences, conditions, and needs before making the final decision between these two options.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 7 tests

Wet Performance
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Wet Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Wet Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Wet Circle Cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein ULTRAC
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Aquaplaning Cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
96%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Best in category: Bridgestone Potenza Sport (88.5%)
Dry Performance
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Dry Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Dry Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Dry Lane Change
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Dry Steering Reaction
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 7 (94.8%)
Comfort & Noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Noise Exterior
Vredestein ULTRAC
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Noise Interior
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
71%
Economy
Vredestein ULTRAC
47%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
24%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (100.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison