These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE
|
Summer
|
2024 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Automotorsport
|
Summer
|
2024 | 235/55 R18 | View |
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2024 | 225/55 R17 | View |
Autozeitung
|
Summer
|
2024 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2024 | 205/55 R16 | View |
ADAC
|
Summer
|
2024 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Autoklub ČR
|
Summer
|
2023 | 205/55 R16 | View |
When comparing the Vredestein ULTRAC and the Michelin Primacy 4+, we can see some noticeable differences, particularly in performance, strengths, and weaknesses, offered by these two summer tyres manufactured by Vredestein and Michelin respectively.
With a rating of 21%, the Vredestein ULTRAC stands out for its features such as Aquaplaning - longitudinal, Aquaplaning - cross, and Dry handling, earning it the 2nd position in the ACE test out of 10 tyres. It also received commendable feedback in the Autobild and Automotorsport tests, earning 3rd position in both. However, it has been marked down for its high rolling resistance, high external noise, increased understeer on wet and dry tracks, and slightly prolonged braking distances.
Made in Spain, the Michelin Primacy 4+, with a rating of 76%, surpasses its competitor from Vredestein in many aspects. It has been replaced by a newer model, the Michelin Primacy 5. Notably, it showcased its strength in Dry handling in the ACE test, even if it only reached the 3rd place. In the automotorsport test, it got the 8th position but did surprisingly better in the ADAC and Autoklub ČR tests where it secured the 2nd spot. It struggled with long braking distances, weak cornering grip and poor traction on wet road conditions, and an increased risk of oversteering during quick lane changes and in load-altering situations.
In conclusion, the Michelin Primacy 4+ appears to have a better overall performance, primarily due to balanced capabilities, secure properties on both dry and wet tracks, and an impressively high projected mileage coupled with low weight and fuel consumption. On the other hand, the Vredestein ULTRAC seems to falter on a couple of points, such as increased rolling resistance and exterior noise, and it shows lower mileage projection and high wear and tear, which might be relevant if you are considering the value for money. However, it holds up with its secure handling properties and universally good aquaplaning characteristics.
It's important to consider your driving preferences, conditions, and needs before making the final decision between these two options.
Averaged from 7 tests
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Vredestein ULTRAC
Michelin Primacy 4+
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.