• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

The Vredestein ULTRAC and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 are two summer tyres which have been subject to meticulous testing and reviews. Both have proven strengths and a few weaknesses, yet they offer different experiences for drivers.


The Vredestein ULTRAC, made in Hungary, is the recommended model for the BMW 2-series Active Tourer, which adds to its credibility. According to Autobild, it ranked 14th out of 21 tyres tested, demonstrating reasonable but not outstanding performance. Furthermore, this model excels in driving dynamics. Whether it's wet or dry, the Vredestein ULTRAC delivers ultra-short braking distances and exceptional aquaplaning characteristics. One downside, however, is its reduced mileage and heightened rolling resistance.


On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 appears to offer a more balanced experience. With its comfort and exterior noise reduction recognised as its best features, it provides higher ride comfort compared to the Vredestein ULTRAC. The Dynaxer HP4 also secures a slightly better 13th position in the Autobild test. High points are given to its good aquaplaning safety and relatively short dry braking distances; however, its handling could be improved, and its tire life is considered mediocre.


In mutual tests, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 outperformed the Vredestein ULTRAC overall, with its strengths resulting in a rating of 76%, compared to the Vredestein's ULTRAC 26%. Although it fell short on grip in wet conditions and steering response, it did remarkably well in aquaplaning security and had short brake distances both on wet and dry roads.


Even though the Vredestein ULTRAC is notable for its performance in wet and dry conditions, its reduced mileage and high rolling resistance are points to consider. As it stands, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 seems to offer a more balanced, comfortable, and quiet driving experience, making it the better choice amongst the two, although it does come with its own shortcomings.


The choice depends on personal preferences and driving conditions; hence, both remain viable options. Nonetheless, these observations can assist in cultivating an informed decision to cater to specific needs and desires.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Vredestein ULTRAC
89%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Wet Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Wet Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
53%
Wet Circle Cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
65%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
68%
Best: Debica Presto UHP2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
68%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Dry Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Dry Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (87.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
88%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Noise Exterior
Vredestein ULTRAC
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Ride Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Economy
Vredestein ULTRAC
47%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
72%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
35%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (96.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison