Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Table of contents:
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R17 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to tyres, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 both deliver impressive performances across multiple tests. Here is a detailed comparison of the two.
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
With a solid rating of 71%, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro produced in NL, HL, is a reliable summer tyre that demonstrates good traits on both dry and wet conditions. In the Autobild test, it scored 18th out of 52 tyres, with its strongest features being Aquaplaning - longitudinal and Comfort. The tyre was also rated well in ADAC and Autozeitung tests where it held 5th and 6th positions respectively out of 18 and 10 tyres. However, a few downsides to this tyre include its satisfactory predicted mileage and relatively higher weight.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
On the other hand, we have the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. Manufactured in DE, this summer UHP tyre, part of a lineage that included the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, is highly rated at 93%. It bagged the 6th position in Autobild out of 52, with its, Exterior noise, Dry handling, Comfort, mileage, and price/value being its best features. In the Autozeitung and ADAC tests, it bested the competition by securing the 1st and 4th spots respectively. Its high-score attributes to its excellent safety reserves, good steering response, short braking distances in wet conditions, and outstanding mileage. However, no data is available for its downside specific to Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Verdict
Both Vredestein and Goodyear produce reputable summer tyres that far surpass many of the competitors in the market. However, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 seems to have a higher consistent performance across the multiple tests, making it arguably a better option amongst the two. Users should, however, keep in mind other factors like the type of use, regional conditions, and personal preferences when deciding.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Test winner
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Rating: Highly recommended | 279 | 140 | 139 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | 34.1 | 28.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
