• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2025 245/35 R19 View
Autozeitung Autozeitung
Summer
2025 225/45 R18 View

When it comes to tyres, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 both deliver impressive performances across multiple tests. Here is a detailed comparison of the two.


Vredestein Ultrac Pro


With a solid rating of 71%, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro produced in NL, HL, is a reliable summer tyre that demonstrates good traits on both dry and wet conditions. In the Autobild test, it scored 18th out of 52 tyres, with its strongest features being Aquaplaning - longitudinal and Comfort. The tyre was also rated well in ADAC and Autozeitung tests where it held 5th and 6th positions respectively out of 18 and 10 tyres. However, a few downsides to this tyre include its satisfactory predicted mileage and relatively higher weight.


Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6


On the other hand, we have the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. Manufactured in DE, this summer UHP tyre, part of a lineage that included the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, is highly rated at 93%. It bagged the 6th position in Autobild out of 52, with its, Exterior noise, Dry handling, Comfort, mileage, and price/value being its best features. In the Autozeitung and ADAC tests, it bested the competition by securing the 1st and 4th spots respectively. Its high-score attributes to its excellent safety reserves, good steering response, short braking distances in wet conditions, and outstanding mileage. However, no data is available for its downside specific to Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.


Verdict


Both Vredestein and Goodyear produce reputable summer tyres that far surpass many of the competitors in the market. However, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 seems to have a higher consistent performance across the multiple tests, making it arguably a better option amongst the two. Users should, however, keep in mind other factors like the type of use, regional conditions, and personal preferences when deciding.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
81%
Goodyear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Wet Braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
81%
Wet Handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
86%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
93%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
79%
Aquaplaning Cross
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
90%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
77%
Best in category: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (97.2%)
Dry Performance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
79%
Goodyear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Dry Braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
79%
Dry Handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
79%
Best in category: Bridgestone Potenza Sport (99.3%)
Comfort & Noise
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
81%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
90%
Goodyear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Noise Exterior
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
81%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
90%
Best in category: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (95.0%)
Economy
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
71%
Goodyear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
71%
Best in category: Firestone Firehawk Sport (93.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison