12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Viking WinTech vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Avon ZV7

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Viking WinTech /53%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52 /55%	Vredestein Wintrac Pro /54%	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /79%	Avon ZV7 /12%

Dimensions	R13 - R20	R0 - R21	R17 - R22	R14 - R20	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

4. Viking WinTech Lowcost

5. Avon ZV7 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Avon ZV7 278

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 192

3. Vredestein Wintrac Pro 123

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 111

5. Viking WinTech 53

Number of tests

1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro 37x

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 13x

3. Avon ZV7 11x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 10x

5. Viking WinTech 6x

Best position in test

1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro 1.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2.

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

4. Avon ZV7 8.

5. Viking WinTech 11.

Worst position in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 9.

2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro 20.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 25.

4. Viking WinTech 41.

5. Avon ZV7 42.

Average position in tests

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6.31

2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro 6.41

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 12.2

4. Avon ZV7 18.55

5. Viking WinTech 20.83

Year of the last test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2024

3. Viking WinTech 2024

4. Vredestein Wintrac Pro 2024

5. Avon ZV7 2023

Best rating in test

1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

3. Viking WinTech Recommended

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory

5. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended

3. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended

4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

75.6%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

72.3%

Vredestein
Wintrac Pro

64%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

57%

Viking
WinTech

52%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 B

2. Avon ZV7 ?

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

4. Vredestein Wintrac Pro ?

5. Viking WinTech ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

78.8%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

76.6%

Vredestein
Wintrac Pro

66%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

55%

Viking
WinTech

48%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

81.5%

Vredestein
Wintrac Pro

76%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

66%

Viking
WinTech

52%

Avon
ZV7

?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

82.3%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

66.2%

Vredestein
Wintrac Pro

61%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

52%

Viking
WinTech

46%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Avon ZV7 ?

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

3. Vredestein Wintrac Pro ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 ?

5. Viking WinTech ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

70.8%

Viking
WinTech

69%

Avon
ZV7

58.7%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

51%

Vredestein
Wintrac Pro

41%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 C

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

3. Viking WinTech ?

4. Avon ZV7 ?

5. Vredestein Wintrac Pro ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Viking
WinTech

84%

Vredestein
Wintrac Pro

80.7%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

0%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

?

Avon
ZV7

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 215/55 R17

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.7	2.1	2.2	1.7	2.7	1.6	1.3
Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory	2.8	2.8	3.6	3.1	4.3	3.0	2.2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient	2.3	2.6	3.6	2.6	3.9	1.8	1.5
Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good	2.4	2.4	2.2	2.3	2.9	2.0	2.1
Show test details