Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Viking WinTech Lowcost
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Viking WinTech Lowcost
3. Viking WinTech 20.83
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary2. Viking WinTech Recommended3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,4 | 30,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 37,1 | 27,1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,9 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||