12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Viking WinTech vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. Tristar Snowpower HP

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Viking WinTech /53%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52 /55%	Uniroyal WinterExpert /79%	Tristar Snowpower HP /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R20	R0 - R21	R13 - R20	R13 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle

3. Viking WinTech Lowcost

4. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 192

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 91

3. Tristar Snowpower HP 58

4. Viking WinTech 53

Number of tests

1. Uniroyal WinterExpert 12x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 10x

3. Viking WinTech 6x

4. Tristar Snowpower HP 3x

Best position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2.

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 5.

3. Viking WinTech 11.

4. Tristar Snowpower HP 15.

Worst position in test

1. Uniroyal WinterExpert 19.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 25.

3. Viking WinTech 41.

4. Tristar Snowpower HP 46.

Average position in tests

1. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 12.2

3. Viking WinTech 20.83

4. Tristar Snowpower HP 33

Year of the last test

1. Uniroyal WinterExpert 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2024

3. Viking WinTech 2024

4. Tristar Snowpower HP 2021

Best rating in test

1. Viking WinTech Recommended

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory

4. Tristar Snowpower HP ?

Worst rating in test

1. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient

4. Tristar Snowpower HP ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

58%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

57%

Viking
WinTech

52%

Tristar
Snowpower HP

0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 B

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert C

3. Viking WinTech ?

4. Tristar Snowpower HP ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Tristar
Snowpower HP

88.3%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

65.3%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

55%

Viking
WinTech

48%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

68.1%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

66%

Viking
WinTech

52%

Tristar
Snowpower HP

32.6%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

73.4%

Tristar
Snowpower HP

72%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

52%

Viking
WinTech

46%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Uniroyal WinterExpert ?

2. Tristar Snowpower HP ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 ?

4. Viking WinTech ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Tristar
Snowpower HP

73.7%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

72.4%

Viking
WinTech

69%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

51%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Uniroyal WinterExpert C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 C

3. Tristar Snowpower HP ?

4. Viking WinTech ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Viking
WinTech

84%

Tristar
Snowpower HP

80%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

32%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 215/55 R17

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.7	2.1	2.2	1.7	2.7	1.6	1.3
Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory	2.8	2.8	3.6	3.1	4.3	3.0	2.2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient	2.3	2.6	3.6	2.6	3.9	1.8	1.5
Show test details