12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Viking WinTech vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Viking WinTech /53%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52 /55%	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /79%	Avon ZV7 /17%	Nexen N blue HD Plus /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R20	R0 - R21	R14 - R20	R13 - R21	R13 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

3. Viking WinTech Lowcost

4. Avon ZV7 Lowcost

5. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Nexen N blue HD Plus 430

2. Avon ZV7 278

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 192

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 111

5. Viking WinTech 53

Number of tests

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 13x

2. Avon ZV7 11x

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 10x

4. Nexen N blue HD Plus 10x

5. Viking WinTech 6x

Best position in test

1. Nexen N blue HD Plus 1.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2.

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

4. Avon ZV7 8.

5. Viking WinTech 11.

Worst position in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 9.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 25.

3. Nexen N blue HD Plus 31.

4. Viking WinTech 41.

5. Avon ZV7 42.

Average position in tests

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6.31

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 12.2

3. Nexen N blue HD Plus 13.6

4. Avon ZV7 18.55

5. Viking WinTech 20.83

Year of the last test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2024

3. Viking WinTech 2024

4. Avon ZV7 2023

5. Nexen N blue HD Plus 2019

Best rating in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

2. Viking WinTech Recommended

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory

4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory

5. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended

3. Avon ZV7 Sufficient

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient

5. Nexen N blue HD Plus Weak

Wet

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

75.6%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

72.3%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

62.6%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

57%

Viking
WinTech

52%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 B

2. Avon ZV7 ?

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

4. Nexen N blue HD Plus ?

5. Viking WinTech ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

81.5%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

66%

Viking
WinTech

52%

Avon
ZV7

?

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

78.8%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

76.6%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

69%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

55%

Viking
WinTech

48%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

82.3%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

76.6%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

66.2%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

52%

Viking
WinTech

46%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Avon ZV7 ?

2. Nexen N blue HD Plus ?

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 ?

5. Viking WinTech ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

70.8%

Viking
WinTech

69%

Avon
ZV7

58.7%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

57.3%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

51%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 C

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

3. Viking WinTech ?

4. Avon ZV7 ?

5. Nexen N blue HD Plus ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Viking
WinTech

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

0%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

?

Avon
ZV7

?

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 215/55 R17

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.7	2.1	2.2	1.7	2.7	1.6	1.3
Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory	2.8	2.8	3.6	3.1	4.3	3.0	2.2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient	2.3	2.6	3.6	2.6	3.9	1.8	1.5
Show test details