Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Viking WinTech Lowcost4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost5. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost8. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Viking WinTech Lowcost4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost5. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost8. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
6. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.777. Viking WinTech 20.83
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended4. Viking WinTech Recommended5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory6. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory7. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
3. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended4. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient6. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||