Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Viking WinTech Lowcost4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost5. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
Comparison: Viking WinTech vs. Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.775. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Viking WinTech Recommended4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory5. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient5. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
