Segment
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Sava (58%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Eskimo S3+ and Fulda Kristall Montero 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Kristall Montero 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (87%) of the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||