Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle4. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory3. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended3. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D3 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
