12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Nokian Powerproof /0%	GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 /0%	Nexen N fera Sport /84%	Vredestein Ultrac Vorti /0%

Dimensions	R17 - R20	R17 - R22	R16 - R22	R17 - R24
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Today, we compare two standout models in the tyre industry: the Nokian Powerproof and the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. Both models are built for summer and offer unique strengths and weaknesses.

The Nokian Powerproof

Made in Finland, the Nokian Powerproof is a trustworthy option rated 51% by us. While it doesn't come from a line of previous models, it has been replaced by a newer version, the Nokian Powerproof 1. In various tests, the Nokian Powerproof consistently ranked in the middle, highlighting strengths in areas such as wet braking and handling on gravel. Noise levels were also notably low.

The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

From the respected brand GoodYear, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 builds upon its predecessor, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. It has been replaced by the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. This tyre, manufactured in Slovenia and Germany, boasts an outstanding rating of 80% from us.

In a variety of tests, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 consistently outperformed the Powerproof, often securing the top spot. It excelled particularly in "Aquaplaning - cross," "Wet braking," and other areas of wet performance. This tyre also displayed strengths in dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise level, comfort, mileage, and even price/value.

Comparison Summary

In comparison tests, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 consistently ranked higher than the Nokian Powerproof, snagging a first-place position in tests conducted by Autozeitung, AutoMotorSport, and Autobild. In terms of features, the GoodYear Eagle tyre proved to be the superior choice, showing exceptional performance in both wet and dry conditions, with a bonus in mileage and price/value.

The Nokian Powerproof, on the other hand, showed its strength in interior noise control and wet performance, though it didn't perform as consistently across all test areas. Overall, while the Nokian Powerproof is a solid tyre, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 seems to offer a more consistent and superior performance across the board.

Segment

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Premium

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium

3. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle

4. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 173

2. Nexen N fera Sport 96

3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 74

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

Number of tests

1. Nexen N fera Sport 17x

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 15x

3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 13x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 1.

2. Nexen N fera Sport 1.

3. Nokian Powerproof 2.

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 3.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 6.

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 12.

3. Nexen N fera Sport 17.

4. Nokian Powerproof 21.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2.33

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 6.62

3. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

4. Nexen N fera Sport 9.29

Year of the last test

1. Nexen N fera Sport 2025

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2022

3. Nokian Powerproof 2022

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 2020

Best rating in test

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary

3. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary

4. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary

Worst rating in test

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Good

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Good

3. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory

4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

84%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

81%

Nokian
Powerproof

74%

Nexen
N fera Sport

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 84%

2. Nexen N fera Sport 81%

3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 79%

4. Nokian Powerproof 75%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 88%

2. Nexen N fera Sport 82%

3. Nokian Powerproof 77%

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 74%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 88%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 84%

3. Nokian Powerproof 71%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 70%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 86%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 83%

3. Nokian Powerproof 80%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 52%

Wet circle cornering

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 78%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 74%

3. Nokian Powerproof 65%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 45%

Wet side guide

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 96%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 84%

3. Nokian Powerproof 79%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 74%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 A

2. Nokian Powerproof A

3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

4. Nexen N fera Sport ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

89%

Nokian
Powerproof

75%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

75%

Nexen
N fera Sport

74%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 93%

2. Nokian Powerproof 90%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 87%

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 87%

Dry handling

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 86%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 84%

3. Nokian Powerproof 79%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 60%

Dry lane changing

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 91%

2. Nokian Powerproof 86%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 86%

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 0%

Offroad

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

92%

Nokian
Powerproof

89.6%

Nexen
N fera Sport

0%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

84%

Nokian
Powerproof

72%

Nexen
N fera Sport

66%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

62%

Rolling resistance

1. Nokian Powerproof 75%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 68%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 56%

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 48%

Mileage

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 91%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 73%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 62%

4. Nokian Powerproof 62%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 C

2. Nokian Powerproof C

3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

4. Nexen N fera Sport ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nexen
N fera Sport

77%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

74%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

71%

Nokian
Powerproof

70%

Exterior noise

1. Nexen N fera Sport 89%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 75%

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 67%

4. Nokian Powerproof 54%

Comfort

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 86%

2. Nexen N fera Sport 81%

3. Nokian Powerproof 66%

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 70 dB

2. Nexen N fera Sport ?

3. Nokian Powerproof ?

4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2021 225/40 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	92	93	93
Nokian Powerproof	85	83	87
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Test winner	92	93	92
Nexen N fera Sport	74	63	85
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Summer tyre test 2020 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Comfort
Best values in test	9,4	9,3	10	10	10
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good	6,8	7,8	8	6	6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good	9,4	9,2	6	10	10
Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory	5,8	8,2	6	10	10
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	1-	1
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good	1-	2+	2-
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	1
Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Exemplary	2	1-	2-
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1	28,7
Nokian Powerproof	32,9	29,1
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5	33,2	30,8
Nexen N fera Sport	33,2	30,9
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti	33,4	31,3
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	1,3	2,8	2,0	1,6
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,4	2,8	3,0	2,0
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good	2,3	1,7	3,1	2,0	1,9
Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,2	3,1	2,0	1,9
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,5	2,9	2,0	2,4
Show test details

Gute-Fahrt Summer tyre test 2019 225/40 R18

Name
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Very good -
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good -
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	1-	1-
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2+
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Offroad
Best values in test	1-	2+	2+
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	2+
Show test details

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Add to comparison

The Nokian Powerproof

The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Comparison Summary

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands