Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle5. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Nokian Powerproof 7.454. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.255. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended3. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
