Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
| # | Nexen CP672 A
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Vredestein ULTRAC
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R14 - R17 | R14 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.253. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended3. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
