Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
