Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended4. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
