Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 10x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 6

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2026

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary

3. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Good

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

4. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient

5. Nexen CP672 A ?