18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Michelin Primacy 4 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 7 /98%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%	Kumho Ecsta HS52 /69%	Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun /67%	Bridgestone Turanza 6 /77%	Vredestein ULTRAC /16%

Dimensions	R14 - R23	R16 - R21	R13 - R23	R14 - R20	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium

5. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Michelin Primacy 4 384

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 225

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

7. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 25x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Michelin Primacy 4 20x

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 12x

6. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Michelin Primacy 4 1.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2.

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin Primacy 4 8.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 16.

7. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.24

2. Michelin Primacy 4 3.5

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 6.25

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

7. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2025

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

7. Michelin Primacy 4 2022

Best rating in test

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary

4. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended

5. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended

6. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Good

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Good

4. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

7. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 7

86%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

84%

Michelin
Primacy 4

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

73%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

73%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

2. Michelin Primacy 4 86%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 93%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 85%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

6. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 59%

7. Michelin Primacy 4 59%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 85%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Michelin Primacy 4 77%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 75%

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 88%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 85%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

6. Michelin Primacy 4 73%

7. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 84%

4. Michelin Primacy 4 83%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 73%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 100%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 73%

4. Michelin Primacy 4 68%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 65%

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

7. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 A

3. Michelin Primacy 4 A

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

7. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Primacy 4

84%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

83%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

83%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

79%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

77%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

Dry braking

1. Michelin Primacy 4 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 86%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 77%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 83%

4. Michelin Primacy 4 81%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 79%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 78%

Dry driving behavior

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 89%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 83%

3. Michelin Primacy 4 83%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

6. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Michelin Primacy 4 90%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 88%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 84%

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 82%

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

7. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 96%

2. Michelin Primacy 4 86%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 84%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 66%

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

7. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Primacy 4

78%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

73%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

72%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

0%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

0%

Gravel traction

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 87%

2. Michelin Primacy 4 82%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 69%

6. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Grass traction

1. Michelin Primacy 4 88%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 71%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 61%

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 62%

6. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Sand traction

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 87%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 82%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

5. Michelin Primacy 4 66%

6. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Handling on gravel

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 82%

2. Michelin Primacy 4 81%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 80%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 78%

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

6. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
ULTRAC

83%

Michelin
Primacy 4

80%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

75%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

58%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin Primacy 4 78%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 72%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

6. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 65%

Comfort

1. Michelin Primacy 4 83%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 76%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 66%

6. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 0%

Interior noise

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 88%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 86%

3. Michelin Primacy 4 82%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 73%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 67%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 51%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

3. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 ?

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Primacy 4

87%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

70%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

68%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

55%

Rolling resistance

1. Michelin Primacy 4 88%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 79%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 67%

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 55%

Mileage

1. Michelin Primacy 4 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 70%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

7. Vredestein ULTRAC 29%

Price/value

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 90%

3. Michelin Primacy 4 83%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 77%

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 71%

7. Bridgestone Turanza 6 54%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin Primacy 4 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

7. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands