Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium3. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
In the world of tyres, the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 both hold their own, particularly within the touring, summer tyre category. However, upon examining test data thoroughly, some differences between these two models become readily evident.
The Michelin Primacy 4+ has lived up to the expectations set by its previous models, the Michelin Primacy 4 and Michelin Primacy 3, boasting a strong rating of 77%. The Primacy 4+ stands out for its impressive exterior noise control and admirable performance on dry surfaces. ADAC tests underline this tyre’s exceptional wet grip, high aquaplaning resistance, and low noise levels. There were, however, a few minor drawbacks noted such as slightly sluggish dry handling.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, slightly surpasses the Primacy 4+ in rating with a score of 78%. According to Autobild, its strong points include dry and wet braking and handling. Despite its excellent performance in the different testing conditions, it was reported to have a slightly less satisfying rolling comfort while bringing remarkable mileage and wet circle cornering capabilities to the table, as highlighted by ADAC.
All comparisons considered, both tyres have shown considerable strength in mutual tests. The Michelin Primacy 4+ landed at position 7 in Vibilagare's test, whereas the Kumho Ecsta HS52 reached position 3. Similarly, in Autobild's vast test involving 55 tyres, Kumho Ecsta HS52 outperformed the Michelin Primacy 4+ coming in 2nd compared to Michelin's 5th place.
In conclusion, while the Michelin Primacy 4+ is commended for its exemplary noise control and overall balanced performance, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 offers an appealing package with its excellent dry and wet handling, good mileage and its slightly higher rating. However, personal preference, driving conditions and usage may determine which of these two quality tyres is the better fit for individual motorists.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.675. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary3. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended4. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
7
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 87 | ||||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ | 75 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 84 | ||||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 80 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ | 36,3 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,5 | 28,0 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 36,9 | 27,9 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,1 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC Rating: Sufficient | 3,83 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ | 102,6 | 103,9 | 101,4 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 96,9 | 94,3 | 99,5 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 101,3 | 103,3 | 99,2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Highly recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Good | 1,6 | 2,3 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
