• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

In this comparison, we will take a look at two popular summer tyres – the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the Nokian Powerproof. Both tyres are designed to provide excellent performance in dry and wet conditions, but let's take a closer look at the strengths and weaknesses of each based on the data from various tyre tests conducted by different organizations.


The Michelin Pilot Sport 4, with an overall rating of 94%, has been praised for its impressive dry braking, dry handling, and wet handling. The tyre replaced the Michelin Pilot Sport 3 and has since been upgraded with a newer model, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5. Manufactured in Spain and Germany, the Pilot Sport 4 also performs well in wet conditions, excelling in tests such as aquaplaning resistance and longitudinal performance.


On the other hand, the Nokian Powerproof has an overall rating of 85% and is known for its safety and neutrality, even in wet conditions. Manufactured in Finland, this tyre also has good reserves for handling wet surfaces and offers precise control and responsiveness in dry corners. Despite these strengths, the Nokian Powerproof does have some limitations, including aquaplaning safety and a noticeable noise issue.


In the tests conducted by AutoMotorSport, out of the 11 tyres tested, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ranked 2nd, while the Nokian Powerproof came in at 7th. The Michelin tyre scored well in dry steering response, aquaplaning resistance, and both dry and wet handling. In contrast, the Nokian tyre only stood out in dry steering response.


According to Autozeitung, in a comparison of 10 tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ranked 4th, while the Nokian Powerproof came in 6th. The Michelin tyre received high praise for its dry braking performance.


In the Autobild tests, out of 11 tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ranked 4th, while the Nokian Powerproof came in 7th. The Michelin tyre performed exceptionally in aquaplaning resistance and dry braking. The Nokian tyre, on the other hand, was recognized for its wet braking performance.


The ADAC tests featured 16 tyres, with the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 taking 2nd place and the Nokian Powerproof coming in 11th. The Michelin tyre excelled in dry braking performance and mileage, while the Nokian tyre was praised for its noise reduction and interior noise performance.


In conclusion, based on the test results, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 comes out as the better performer overall, especially in terms of handling, braking performance, and aquaplaning resistance. However, the Nokian Powerproof is a worthy alternative if you prefer a safer, more comfortable ride, as it performs well in wet conditions and offers a quieter experience.


For more information on these tyres and other options, please visit Michelin and Nokian.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
84%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Nokian Powerproof
78%
Nokian
Powerproof
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
78%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
80%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Wet Braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
92%
Nokian Powerproof
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
89%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Nexen N fera Sport
92%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
87%
Wet Handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
81%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
73%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
78%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
80%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Nexen N fera Sport
69%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
80%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
85%
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Nexen N fera Sport
85%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%
Best: Kumho Ecsta PS71 (89.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
80%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Nexen N fera Sport
70%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
84%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (88.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (85.0%)
Dry Performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
94%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Nokian
Powerproof
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
79%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Dry Braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
99%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Nexen N fera Sport
81%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
86%
Dry Handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
88%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Nexen N fera Sport
55%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
71%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
75%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Continental PremiumContact 6
67%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
68%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Noise Exterior
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
78%
Nokian Powerproof
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
60%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Nexen N fera Sport
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
75%
Noise Interior
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
76%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Nexen N fera Sport
64%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
69%
Ride Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
71%
Nokian Powerproof
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
71%
Nexen N fera Sport
61%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
61%
Best in category: Fulda SportControl 2 (88.0%)
Economy
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
79%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
89%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
65%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
71%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
55%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
46%
Best: Apollo Aspire XP (96.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Nexen N fera Sport
87%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
76%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
80%
Nokian Powerproof
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Nexen N fera Sport
62%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
73%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison