Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Handling on gravel
Sand traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
