Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 64% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza 6 was done in 2023, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 255/55 R18 test, where both the Turanza 6 and the Ecsta PS71 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Bridgestone Turanza 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Turanza 6 is made - Spain.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||