Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has a better rating of 93% compared to 64% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 255/55 R18 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 SUV and the Ecsta PS71 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Pilot Sport 4 SUV is made - Poland/Spain.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R23 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||