Segment
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended3. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended3. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 1 | 2,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
