Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca Rating: Satisfactory | 2.6 | ||||||
| Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Grip 5 | 35,9 | 31,3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
