In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Leao) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Leao (7%). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro has a better rating of 55% compared to 7% of the Leao Winter Defender UHP. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the Winter Defender UHP and the EuroWinter HS02 Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Winter
|
2025 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Leao Winter Defender UHP
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.