Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle5. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost6. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle5. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost6. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.355. Barum Polaris 5 15.156. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary3. Barum Polaris 5 Good4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory5. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory6. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 37,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,1 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1- | 2- | |||
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||