Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Barum Polaris 5 15.154. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 35,1 | 29,3 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 37,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
