• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea and G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Wet Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
62%
Wet Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
61%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
53%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
46%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Best in category: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (88.6%)
Dry Performance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dry Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Dry Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Best in category: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (90.0%)
Snow Performance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Snow Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow Traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
Snow Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Best: Giti Gitiwinter W2 (96.0%)
Snow Circle Cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Best: Giti Gitiwinter W2 (91.0%)
Best in category: Kleber KRISALP HP3 (90.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
59%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Noise Exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Best: Giti Gitiwinter W2 (95.0%)
Ride Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Best in category: Giti Gitiwinter W2 (95.0%)
Economy
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
63%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rolling Resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Best: Barum Polaris 5 (96.0%)
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
Best: Michelin Alpin 6 (98.0%)
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 870 (90.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison