14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Kleber (69%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 98% compared to 69% of the Kleber KRISALP HP3. The first tyre test of Kleber KRISALP HP3 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the WinterContact TS 870 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /69%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /98%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 107

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 25x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 16x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.75

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 7.68

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2023

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 82%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 74%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 62%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 84%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 62%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

75%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 77%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 72%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

75%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 71%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 86%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 75%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

82%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 75%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 73%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

82%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

69%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 65%

Price/value

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 72%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84.5%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

83%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Kleber Krisalp HP3	37.8	29.3
Continental WinterContact TS 870	37.1	29.1
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Winter tyre test 2022 225/45 R17

Name
Kleber Krisalp HP3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Highly recommended
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2,8	2,9	1,8	2,2	1,8	2,8	2,5
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good	2,1	2,4	1,6	1,9	2,1	2,8	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	3+	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
Continental WinterContact TS 870	34,2	27,7
Show test details

Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands