Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7
We'll be comparing two well-recognised summer tyres - the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Continental PremiumContact 6. The Continental PremiumContact 6 has been an impressive successor to the earlier Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, however, it has been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Starting with the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, this tyre achieves an overall rating of 74% and is a standard summer tyre. According to the ADAC test, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 enjoys the position of 11 out of 17 tyres and shines in exterior noise. The tyre also showcased favourable environmental balance, lifespan, abrasion, and efficiency as per the Autobild 2021 report. On the other hand, reviewers noted its less balanced nature and weaknesses on wet roads.
Contrarily, the Continental PremiumContact 6, scores slightly higher, sitting at a rating of 78%. This tyre is designed for touring and is made in SK, DE, and CZ. ADAC test positioned this model at the 2nd spot among 17 tyres and highlighted its excellent wet handling and wet circle cornering. In both autobild 2021 and adac 2021, reviewers commended it as highly balanced offering high driving safety, good performance on dry and wet roads, and long lifespan. The only notable limitation was less impressive efficiency.
When comparing mutual test results, in the Autobild ranking of 53 models, the Continental PremiumContact 6 performed better than the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, securing the 4th position, excelling at wet braking, whereas Kleber took the 14th spot with its comfort and exterior noise features.
Despite some notable strengths of the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, like good fuel consumption and comfort, some weaknesses like increased wear and poor performance on wet roads are evident. On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 6 offers an excellent balance of features, achieves high driving safety, performs well on both wet and dry roads, and has no significant weaknesses, as per the tests. However, it is notable that it has been replaced by the newer Continental PremiumContact 7, which may be worth considering.
In conclusion, for overall performance and test results, the Continental PremiumContact 6 holds a slight advantage over the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, though both tyres showcase distinct strengths.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 1,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 36,5 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,1 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
